[NCLUG] "red hat - the new redmond?" comment from mainstream online media
kevin at scrye.com
Sat Sep 7 15:54:11 MDT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Idris" == Idris S Hamid <ishamid at attbi.com> writes:
>> The TeX shipped with redhat is 'tetex'. Which as far as I can see
>> is GPL'ed. Am I missing something there?
Idris> Some teTeX packages are gpl'd by their individual authors, but
Idris> the core of TeX as licensed by D. E. Knuth is probably
Idris> incompatible with the GPL. Any changes to Knuth's source by
Idris> anyone other than Knuth cannot be called "TeX" or "METAFONT",
Idris> whether during his life or after his death;->
Idris> The LaTeX Project Public License is definitely incompatible
Idris> with the GPL. LaTeX is of course the most common TeX
Idris> macropackage. See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
indeed. An excellent link.
The software contained in the teTeX-src-*.tar.gz package is covered by
several licenses (e.g. GPL, LGPL, X license). All of them are compatible
with the requirements defined for "Open Source Software".
remember that fsf takes a stricter line on license issues than the
general "Open Source" community.
>> again, could you provide a cite for this?
Idris> The first stuff u asked me to cite I've done so in response to
Idris> J Paul; the other stuff would take some research since it's
Idris> ancient history but most of facts underlying my analysis are
Idris> common knowledge:
Idris> Fact1: RH refused to carry KDE in general, _ostensibly_ for
Idris> free-software concerns;
Idris> Fact2: The German version of RH carried KDE before the change
Idris> in the QT. license, _in spite of_ free-software concerns.
I would dispute this "fact".
Since this is ancient history redhat seem to have removed the page
that would prove this. ;(
Take a look at:
Which seems to imply it was "scoop" from linuxworld that broke the
story about german redhat shipping KDE, and he retracted his comments
in that article. He points to:
which redhat has removed and I can't seem to find a copy of.
I think what happened is someone took the german redhat and added kde
and released it. It wasn't an "offical" redhat. So I think your facts
are wrong. :) I seem to remember this when it came out...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NCLUG