No subject
Thu Mar 18 20:49:37 MDT 2010
see exactly what I wrote (no ">" quoting) while those with mbox format
will see it with a ">" quote in front of it. :-)
The performance characteristics of the two formats are different.
Sometimes one is faster. Sometimes the other is faster. With mbox I
can use compressed folders easily. Copying the file around is quick.
But Maildir format can't be compressed as easily. Plus copying them
around means creating a lot of small files. Opening and creating many
files or opening and reading many files is slower than just streaming
data into or out of one file. But if you only need to open one or two
of the files then it is much faster. So generally opening and reading
the current mail with my Maildir format mailbox is very fast, faster
than mbox. But if I decide to search through my mailbox looking for
something then it now has to open and read every file and that is
slower than if it were all in one mbox file. Each has its own
advantage.
I tend to keep my current mailbox in Maildir format and then archive
the older stuff into compressed mbox format. When I start to get more
than about 10,000 messages in my Maildir format mailbox then it starts
to slow down. That prompts me to start pruning things off.
Bob
More information about the NCLUG
mailing list