[NCLUG] UCE (was: FREE Advertising at Mall.com (fwd from: free at mall.com))

[Colorado Dagorhir Battle Gaming Association]

-----Original Message-----
From: nclug-admin at nclug.org [mailto:nclug-admin at nclug.org]On Behalf Of
Sean Reifschneider
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:07 PM
To: support at mall.com; sales at mall.com; postmaster at mall.com
Subject: [NCLUG] UCE (was: FREE Advertising at Mall.com (fwd from:
free at mall.com))


In your message (quoted below), you reference:

   >THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT IN COMPLIANCE OF THE
   >EMAIL BILL: SECTION 301. PER SECTION, PARAGRAPH
   >(a) (2) (c) of S. 1618.

Apparently, you don't realize that S.1618 section 301 did not pass.
However, another statute which *DID* pass was Colorado House Bill
1309.  That bill revises Title 6 to include article 2.5.

You seem to be in violation of 6-2.5-103.4 and 6-2.5-103.5.  According to
6-2.5-104.b, an e-mail service provider is able to claim a $10 judgement
per recipient for handling of the e-mail.

We are the e-mail service provider for a local mailing list that you sent
your message to.  That list includes 170 users.  That would entitle us to a
judgement of $1700, plus whatever the individual recipients (who may also
claim a $10 judgement).

Please contact me if you'd like to arrange for your payment to settle this
issue, or to make other arrangements.

Thanks,
Sean

--------------------------

How about this one:

Make money fast, earn $50 - $100 a day filing claims against your junk
email....

The only problem is that the system does not work well for the individual.
I applaud the group effort.  It is the only real way to stick it to them.

Dave Graham