[NCLUG] more than 7 email ids with @Home?

[Benson Chow]

I ended up getting USWorst/Qwest, not because of anything particular
except cost.  $18+$40=$48/mo.  The only thing I dislike is that it's
dynamic IP.  There are other static ip providers though for a bit
more (I heard FRII at 25/mo) - However, there are no rules on this service
(except: spam and hacking pretty much).  No restrictions on bandwidth (I
can flood my connection 24/7 and nobody would bother me or charge me
more) and no firewalls minus the fact that I have to use NAT with my
cisco 675 router.  No cares for servers whatsoever (I run smtp, httpd,
ftp, sshd, amongst other things.)

But again, dynamic IP definately is the downpoint.  I think I've worked
around everything that I need and found having the router there to be
actually quite beneficial (my server can go down, and I still can get in
and redirect the requests to another working machine, and only have 1
public ip address).

But I might be crazy too...

-bc

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Daniel Herrington wrote:

> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:58:58 -0700 (MST)
> From: Daniel Herrington <daniel.herrington at home.com>
> Reply-To: nclug at nclug.org
> To: nclug at nclug.org
> Subject: Re: [NCLUG] more than 7 email ids with @Home?
>
> Benson,
>
> What DSL service and ISP did you get, and what are the costs
> associated with it?  What servers are you allowed to put on it?
>
> Regards,
>    Daniel
>
>
> => Replying to Benson Chow's message, "Re: [NCLUG] more than 7 email ids with @Home?" (Mar 1):
>  >
>  > But you're not "allowed" to do that from the @home user agreement
>  > following the clause "No Servers".  Which is why I decided to go DSL at
>  > higher cost and lower bandwidth...
>  >
>  > -bc
> _______________________________________________
> NCLUG mailing list
> NCLUG at nclug.org
> http://www.nclug.org/mailman/listinfo/nclug
>