[NCLUG] Mesa Networks (broadband)
Rich Young
rich at ExperiencePlus.Com
Thu Aug 15 12:08:24 MDT 2002
Matt-
I got this just after sending my last message -- it sounds like CWX
is a better option than I realized. What do you know about the price of the
equipment it takes to get started? Last I checked, the equipment +
initiation was more than $700, which is well beyond my means at the moment.
--Rich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Taggart [mailto:matt at lackof.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: nclug at nclug.org
> Cc: rich at ExperiencePlus.Com
> Subject: Re: [NCLUG] Mesa Networks (broadband)
>
>
>
> Patrick Riedel writes...
>
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:21:37 -0600
> > Rich Young <rich at ExperiencePlus.Com> wrote:
> >
> > > Part of my ongoing saga of the search for affordable broadband in
> > > parts of FC where DSL/cable are unavailable...
> > >
> >
> > Also, I'm assuming you've heard of CWX (http://www.cwx.net/)?
> >
> > Higher prices, but available now (I believe).
>
> Prices should be coming down soon due to increased
> membership. Adding more
> members would only make that happen faster. I'm not sure if
> they'll go from
> $60 -> $44 right away but if CWX got the 25-50 customers that
> Mesa is asking
> for to create a new repeater site, I bet they might. CWX's
> Terms Of Service
> are probably better too.
>
> --
> Matt Taggart
> matt at lackof.org
>
>
More information about the NCLUG
mailing list