[NCLUG] Public comments on Microsoft Anti-Trust Case Settlement requested
Daniel Miles
dmiles at holly.colostate.edu
Fri Jan 11 14:16:52 MST 2002
What was the settlement exactly? I've not been paying attention.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:37:57 -0700
Evelyn Mitchell <efm at tummy.com> wrote:
> This is an opportunity for the public to comment on the settlement.
> Evelyn Mitchell
> efm at tummy.com
>
> ----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dfarber at earthlink.net> -----
>
> Delivered-From: owner-ip-sub-1-outgoing at admin.listbox.com
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:34:15 -0400
> From: "David Farber" <dfarber at earthlink.net>
> Importance: Normal
> Subject: IP: Fw: M$ Settlement: Public Comments Period Ends Soon.
> To: ip-sub-1 at majordomo.pobox.com
> Reply-To: farber at cis.upenn.edu
> X-QMScan-UniqueID: 7ef2-3c3f3e7f-ceb82a1 at backup.tummy.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson at realmeasures.dyndns.org>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:15:43
> To: C-FIT_Community at realmeasures.dyndns.org,
> C-FIT_Release_Community at realmeasures.dyndns.org, declan at well.com,
> farber at cis.upenn.edu
> Subject: M$ Settlement: Public Comments Period Ends Soon.
>
>
> (Forwarded from NY Linux Scene Hangout list,
> hangout at nylxs.com
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:33:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Brendan W. McAdams" <rit at jacked-in.org>
>
>
> For those of you not familiar with the Tunney act, there is
> a 60 day public review period for all Anti-Trust Cases. It
> is important that the Government knows that the public does
> NOT Approve of the Microsoft Settlement.
>
> The Tunney Act mandated review period for the M$ Settlement
> ends on January 28, 2002. Please let your voice be heard;
> however, please read the case documents and understand the
> case and make INTELLIGENT comments before submitting. Being
> nasty, threatening, and showing you dont truly understand
> the case when commenting will only weaken the standing of
> consumers as a whole; proving to the government that they
> are indeed protecting us from ourselves.
>
> If we are intelligent and show a true understanding of the
> issue at hand, we can truly get our point across at the DOJ.
>
> Info for commeting is at:
> http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms-settle.htm#submit
>
> -Brendan
>
> ____________________________
> New Yorker Linux Users Scene
> Fair Use - because it's either fair use or useless....
>
>
> (Sent from Dave's Blackberry.)
>
> For archives see:
> http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> _______________________________________________
> NCLUG mailing list
> NCLUG at nclug.org
> http://www.nclug.org/mailman/listinfo/nclug
More information about the NCLUG
mailing list