Reply-To Preservation Considered Harmful (was: Re: [NCLUG] users only)

[Matt Taggart]

Eric Brunson writes...

> 
> I am in total agreement with Sean on this matter.
> 
> Let's take a look at the summary of the Munging document:

This, along with the other posts on this topic, would make a good
"reply-to-munging not really harmful and in fact a good thing" document.

I also found,
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002Bs5

and of course the original document that started it all,
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Any volunteers for a web page to put on the nclug site that explains why
the list is the way it is?

-- 
Matt Taggart
matt at lackof.org