[NCLUG] users only

[bof]

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:55:44AM -0600, Mike Loseke wrote:

> Personally, I find the current setting of not setting the Reply-to header
>to the list to be the pain in the arse. Instead of hitting "reply" I have
>to do "reply to all" which is an alien function to my hands after, good
>lord, how many years on this list? I just see it causing more confusion and
>missed posts because someone did a quick reply and it only went to the
>single recipient.
>  
>

Having just done this to Sean (sorry! Sean), I would much rather my 
reply to go to the entire group. If I want to send something off-list, 
then I will take the time to address it as such.

As far as the issue of being a closed list, I have no problems with this 
if it stops annoying ads for printer products, etc. etc. Although I must 
say that I felt honored to see NCLUG in such distinguished company as 
three Hot-mail addresses. <g>

But as far as bouncing messages back to the spammer, why waste bandwidth 
bouncing a message to an address that was probably bogus to being with?

BOF