[NCLUG] SCO (from Breaking news!...)

[James DeWitt]

On Saturday 23 August 2003 12:17 pm, Daniel Miles wrote:
> Why is it that you're so convinced that the clean-room was contaminated?
>
> Of the two examples we've been shown so far, one is BSD code that SCO
> has no rights to and the other is historical code that Caldera
> released... sometime, maybe 2000? Furthermore, the historical code has
> been taken out of the 2.6.x kernels because the kernel programmers
> thought it was too ugly.
>
> I got all this information from an article posted to this forum yet
> we're all still solidly convinced that SCO was violated.

Who is "We?" I think it is a mistake to take 200+ subscribers' 
silence as tacit agreement.  Ignoring an argument represents an
attitude much farther afield than participating in the argument.

> ...snip...

JD