[NCLUG] 1TB Blocksize Limit?
andrew at fc.hp.com
Wed Aug 28 17:38:42 MDT 2002
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:22, DJ Eshelman wrote:
> Okay, Let's just jump into it since I can't think of anything clever.
> My RedHat Advanced
> Server troubles continue! Yay!
> We finally found a FibreChannel card that works out of
> the box (pretty much), the QLogic QLA2310-CK 2Gbit over Copper HBA. This was after not-so-
> valiant efforts by Adaptec and the best wishes and demos from LSI (sorry guys, but it just
> don't work yet!)
> So yay, I get the drivers loaded, everything looks good until I try to find
> the actual storage device (it's an Arena Indy 2600-FC chassis- a device that houses 16 120GB IDE
> drives and puts them into a RAID 5 Array (or whatever, there's a lot of optoins) with two Fibre
> Channel (2Gbit Copper) interfaces.
> I dig a little deeper and it appears that the total size
> of the array is too large (1.6TB) for Linux. This is news to me, so I call them up and confer with a
> few engineers. We know the device works because when I split the drives into two 800GB
> 'virtual' drives it sees them both, it apparently is a limitation of the Kernel in regards to
> blocksizes. Apparently anything over 1TB is not supported by the Kernel I'm using (Advanced
> Server is up to 2.4.9-e.8). Now, I'm an ignoramous when it comes to Kernel stuff, I will admit-
> when the tech started talking about 31 pointer bits per block number or whatever, I started
> drooling and reaching for my club to go hunt for dinner. But this doesn't help matters since
> our goal was to have all 1.6TB of data usable all in one drive mount.
> So does anyone out there
> have any ideas for me? I'm about at wits end with this project and I swear my mind isn't working
> any more- it just flat gave up.
> I can find plenty of 'data' on the web as far as XFS and
> filesystem limits, but according to RedHat this is a block device problem, not a filesystem
> problem. The other 'gotcha' is that I can't really do any major modification to the Kernel and
> still get support. At this point I'm about ready to say screw it, and go with whatever will get
> the job done. Any ideas out there?
> Keep in mind that this is an Intel Xeon (x86) system, so the
> obvious answers are moot (get a 64 bit platform, etc).
I can use 2 TB LUN's on a kernel running 2.4.17 running XFS. I believe
it should work on all 2.4.x kernels. What is failing? Partitioning the
drive, putting a file-system on it? What does /proc/partitions say?
> I appreciate it.
> dj at sgc-inc.net
> NCLUG mailing list NCLUG at nclug.org
> To unsubscribe, subscribe, or modify your settings, go to:
Andrew Patterson Voice: (970) 898-3261
Hewlett-Packard Company Email: andrew at fc.hp.com
More information about the NCLUG