[NCLUG] Looking for user reviews and installation CD-ROMs
Doug Holland
meldroc at frii.com
Mon Nov 20 19:49:58 MST 2000
On Monday 06 November 2000 05:55 pm, Milind Kamble wrote:
> Hi,
> Just joined this mailing list in order to try out
> Linux. Can anyone comment about the merits/demerits of
> the following distributions:
> .. Redhat 7.0
> .. Mandrake 7.1 and/or 7.2
> .. Turbolinux 6.0
>
> Can anyone lend me Redhat or Mandrake cds to try them
> out? I have Turbolinux 6.0 and wanted to compare
> whether the others are better in terms of
> installation and maintainence.
I have installed Red Hat 7.0, using CheapBytes CDs, so I have enough
experience to give a halfway clueful first impression.
The installation had a major glitch - Anaconda came with a bug that
causes a crash with a Python error dump in the middle of installation,
after you've formatted your partitions and before it starts installing
packages, which happens if you try installing on a system (like mine)
with an unmodified partition table (no Anaconda, I don't want to
repartition, I like it the way it is.) Fortunately, Red Hat has been
good about providing fixes, so I downloaded the fix, put it on a fix
floppy, booted the RH install cd with a "linux updates" on the LILO
line, and that solved the problem.
There are several other known major bugs with fixes available on the
Red Hat site (for example, the update daemon that runs in the
background leaks file handles and will crash your system after a few
days, either install the errata or disable the daemon.) Other than
that, RH7 seems to work acceptably. I was able to configure it to boot
into KDE, set up my networking and get online without too much hassle.
I did install KDE 2.0, which didn't come with RH7 due to bad timing,
though the RH7 CDs come with a KDE 2.0 beta in their previews section,
along with a 2.4 pre release kernel and some other goodies.
As far as day-to-day usage goes, I haven't had any major problems after
the installation. KDE 2.0 still needs some bug fixes, but is pretty
stable at this point, good enough for government work. The same can be
said for RH 7.0. As far as the compiler goes, RH7 comes with two
compilers: the 2.96 compiler that has been *ahem* discussed at length.
After using it to build a few things, I have concluded it is Good
Enough for me. It also comes with a kgcc compiler which is used to
compile the kernel, apparently there is some problems with 2.96 dealing
with the kernel.
All in all, I'd say it's working well, for a .0 release. Provided you
make backups and pay attention to the errata on Red Hat's web site it's
good enough for tinkering.
Doug
More information about the NCLUG
mailing list