[NCLUG] any experience modifying gcc specs files?
Mike Loseke
mike at verinet.com
Thu Jun 20 15:22:44 MDT 2002
Thus spake Matthew Wilcox:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:54:59PM -0600, Mike Loseke wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm reading through some threads on the archive there and there's
> > some heated debate about all the gcclib stuff (shared, non-shared, break
> > Solaris' evil ways, etc). Just trying to figure out the best way to get gcc
> > to compile programs that *run* for users without them having to jump
> > through hoops.
>
> Well, if _that_'s all you want, why not configure gcc with --static-libgcc
> (or whatever --enable or --with option it's become?)
I will have to try that. Unfortunately, 'make bootstrap' takes over 4
hours on my little old Ultra2. I've not dinked with any of those options
before - anything to look out for?
My goal here is to use a --prefix=/foo/bar/baz compiled gcc which is NFS
mounted (non-local disk space in a non-normal path) which, when accessed
by users at all sites, creates a binary that knows where to find everything
(within gcc anyway) that it needs to run.
--
| If you hear a Southerner exclaim, "Hey, y'all,
Mike Loseke | watch this!" stay out of his way. These are
mike at verinet.com | likely the last words he will ever say.
More information about the NCLUG
mailing list