[NCLUG] users only

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:55:44AM -0600, Mike Loseke wrote:
>  Personally, I find the current setting of not setting the Reply-to header
> to the list to be the pain in the arse. Instead of hitting "reply" I have
> to do "reply to all" which is an alien function to my hands after, good
> lord, how many years on this list? I just see it causing more confusion and
> missed posts because someone did a quick reply and it only went to the
> single recipient.

no other list i'm on munges the reply-to header in this way.
have you read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.