[NCLUG] Breaking news! SCO is full of crap (big surprise)

[Mike Loseke]

 Semantics.

			Thus spake jbass at dmsd.com:
			> 
			> Absolutely NOT!! Please read carefully what I said:
			> 
			> 	"There are several classes of offending code ... copied, derived, and tainted
			> 	by using illegal reverse engineering techniques or re-development with full
			> 	knowledge of the proprietary original in the case of trade secret claims."
			> 
			> Sean stated "copied" ... very different than "derived" or "tainted". SCO
			> says "infringing" which includes all three classes.
			> 
			> John
			> 
			> 
			> Mike Loseke <mike at verinet.com> writes:
			> > Thus spake jbass at dmsd.com:
			> > > 
			> > > The claim by Sean, and responded to by you, that SCO was claiming there were
			> > > millions of lines copied is to the best of my knowledge false, and none of
			> > > your quotes seem to support Sean's claims.
			> >
			> >  Then we are all in agreement on at least one point: SCO's claims are
			> > less than accurate.


--
   Mike Loseke    |     On the first day
 mike at verinet.com |  Pink Floyd created God