[NCLUG] spam help

[John L. Bass]

bob at proulx.com (Bob Proulx) writes:
> John L. Bass wrote:
> Yes, good questions one and all.  But without a proposal for handling
> those issues then IM2000 is useless.  I might as well be proposing a
> IM2001 mail system that simply says spam-free mail system, and along
> with it post a question, "How do we do this?"  They appear
> equivalently useful proposals to me.

> Am I missing anything about IM2000?  Please educate me.

Agreed, DJ's proposal is incomplete, and lacks an implementation. But
how is that better than an incomplete proposal with an implementation
that doesn't solve the problem?

The complaints against SPF/SRS seem equally valid in this context.

John